|
|
Description and Holding Information
|
|
|
Early Briefs/Records for S.C.,1857-1915, U.S.C. Collection
|
|
(Early Court Records for South Carolina): Trial records and attorney’s briefs for early appealed cases in South Carolina, 1857-1915; materials
scanned from the rare-book-room holdings of the University of South Carolina Law School Library, materials from 459 early cases, the full collection. (The
early court records for the State of South Carolina comprise an exceedingly valuable window into the development of South Carolina society in the years
following the American Civil War. These early lawyers’ briefs and trial transcripts date from an age preceding the regular distribution of “Records &
Briefs” by the appellate courts with which we are familiar today. In the early days, this type of material, if retained at all, was usually collected
by leading law firms for their own internal possible use when faced with subsequent similar adjudication. Eventually, as law firms broke up or lost
interest, these “lawyer collections” migrated to centers of learning such as the law school libraries. All of these unique materials from the rich
collections of the University of South Carolina Law Library are now being scanned by LLMC in a staged process started in January 2012 and expected to last
roughly two years. A Guide to the Materials is being generated and updated as the project proceeds, with newer versions being “swapped in” online as
available. That Guide can be found occupying the “Volume One” location of the title online. A reader seeking to determine whether materials are
already available for a given citation should scroll down on the left margin of the Guide to the citation of interest where current holdings information
will be noted. As an example, see “4 SC 156, McNamee v. Waterbury.” At the head of this case it will be seen that it has been assigned the LLMC-Vol.-No.
“9”. At the end of the title description it is noted that all five of the paper items for this title have been scanned. Therefore, users wishing to
read the briefs & records materials available for 4 SC 156 should go online to and call up the title: “SC - Jud, Early Ct.
Records for So.Car., 1857-1915, the USCLL Collection”. At volume 9 of this collection, they will find the five parts offered as described. On the part of
all LLMC-Digital users, LLMC would like to express sincere thanks to the staff of the University of South Carolina Law School Library for their
generosity in making these rare materials available, and for their extensive efforts in helping to arrange the materials properly for the scanning project.)
|
|
|
Title:
Early court records for South Carolina and other jurisdictions : scanned from the originals held in the rare books collections of the Coleman Karesh Law Library, of the University of South Carolina School of Law.
|
|
|
OCLC Number:
777860948
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available Volumes
|
|
| Name | Fiche Count | Online | Paper Backup |
| Vol. 1, Table of Contents | | Yes | Yes |
| Vol. 2, 11 Rich 288, Gourdin v. West | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 3, 13 Rich Eq 339, South Carolina R.R. Co. v. Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 4, 14 Rich Eq 176, Colburn v. Holland | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 5, 15 Rich 262, Cone v. Brown | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 6, 3 SC 124, Dabney, Morgan & Co. v. Bank of State of South Carolina, pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 6, 3 SC 124, Dabney, Morgan & Co. v. Bank of State of South Carolina, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 7, 3 SC 329, Dupont v. Collins | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 8, 4 SC 106, Donaldson v. Farmer’s and Exchange Bank, et. al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 9, 4 SC 156, McNamee v. Waterbury , pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 9, 4 SC 156, McNamee v. Waterbury , pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 9, 4 SC 156, McNamee v. Waterbury , pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 9, 4 SC 156, McNamee v. Waterbury , pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 9, 4 SC 156, McNamee v. Waterbury , pt.5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 10, 4 SC 353, Waller v. Cresswell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 11, 4 SC 378, State v. Chapeau & Heffron | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 12, 4 SC 380, State v. Graham & Chapeau | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 13, 4 SC 388, Columbia Water Power Co. v. City of Columbia, In the Matter of Alexander and Hook for Contempt , pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 13, 4 SC 388, Columbia Water Power Co. v. City of Columbia, In the Matter of Alexander and Hook for Contempt , pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 13, 4 SC 388, Columbia Water Power Co. v. City of Columbia, In the Matter of Alexander and Hook for Contempt , pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 14, 4 SC 403, State v. Hayne | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.6 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.7 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 15, 4 SC 430, Morton, Bliss & Co. v. Comptroller General , pt.8 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 16, 4 SC 485 State, ex rel, Lartigue and Molony v. Nerland , pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 16, 4 SC 485 State, ex rel, Lartigue and Molony v. Nerland , pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 16, 4 SC 485 State, ex rel, Lartigue and Molony v. Nerland , pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 17, 4 SC 508, Terry v. Calnan, pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 17, 4 SC 508, Terry v. Calnan, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 17, 4 SC 508, Terry v. Calnan, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 17, 4 SC 508, Terry v. Calnan, pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 17, 4 SC 508, Terry v. Calnan, pt.5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 18, 4 SC 520, State v. County Treasurer | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 19, 5 SC 5, Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co. v. Thew, pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 19, 5 SC 5, Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co. v. Thew, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 19, 5 SC 5, Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co. v. Thew, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 20, 5 SC 58, Bachman v. Sulzbacher, pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 20, 5 SC 58, Bachman v. Sulzbacher, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 21, 5 SC 90, Zorn v. Savannah and Charleston R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 22, 5 SC 117, Ex Parte, Carson | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 23, 5 SC 125, Cochran v. Darcy | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 24, 5 SC 128, Armstrong v. Humphreys | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 25, 5 SC 159, 9 NBR 458, Watson v. Citizens’ Savings Bank | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 26, 5 SC 182, Hand v. Savannah & Charleston R.R. Co., et. al., pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 26, 5 SC 182, Hand v. Savannah & Charleston R.R. Co., et. al., pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 26, 5 SC 182, Hand v. Savannah & Charleston R.R. Co., et. al., pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 26, 5 SC 182, Hand v. Savannah & Charleston R.R. Co., et. al., pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 26, 5 SC 182, Hand v. Savannah & Charleston R.R. Co., et. al., pt.5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 26, 5 SC 182, Hand v. Savannah & Charleston R.R. Co., et. al., pt.6 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 27, 5 SC 189, Whaley v. Bank of Charleston | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 28, 5 SC 209, Stolbrand v. Hoge | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 29, 5 SC 221, Ziegler v. Northeastern R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 30, 5 SC 225, Columbia Water Power Company v. City of Columbia, pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 30, 5 SC 225, Columbia Water Power Company v. City of Columbia, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 31, 5 SC 262, Whaley v. Bank of Charleston | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 32, 5 SC 267, Brown v. Kirkpatrick | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 33, 5 SC 297, State v. Cardozo, Treasurer | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 34, 5 SC 351, Cohrs v. Fraser | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 35, 5 SC 379, Magwood v. Railroad Bank | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 36, 5 SC 415, Thew v. Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 36, 5 SC 415, Thew v. Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co., pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 36, 5 SC 415, Thew v. Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Co., pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 37, 5 SC 450, Lesesne v. Witte | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 38, 6 SC 1, State, ex rel, The Citizens’ Savings Bank of S.C. and the S.C. Bank & Trust v. City of Columbia and Jesse E. Dent, Sheriff; State, ex rel, E. J. Scott & Son; Respondents, v. Same Appellants. State, ex rel, D. Gambrill,..... | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 38, 6 SC 1, State, ex rel, The Citizens’ Savings Bank of S.C. and the S.C. Bank & Trust v. City of Columbia and Jesse E. Dent, Sheriff; State, ex rel, E. J. Scott & Son; Respondents, v. Same Appellants. State, ex rel, D. Gambrill,....pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 39, 6 SC 23, McLarin v. Knox & Cunningham | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 40, 6 SC 177, Monaghan v. Small | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 41, 6 SC 243, Chicora Company v. Crews | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 42, 6 SC 316, Edwards v. Sanders | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 43, 6 SC 345, Southern v. Fisher | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 43, 6 SC 345, Southern v. Fisher, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 43, 6 SC 345, Southern v. Fisher, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 44, 6 SC 412, Glenn v. County Commissioners of York | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 45, 6 SC 459, Walker v. Veno | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 46, 6 SC 472, Ex Parte Parker | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 46, 6 SC 472, Ex Parte Parker, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 46, 6 SC 472, Ex Parte Parker, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 46, 6 SC 472, Ex Parte Parker, pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 47, 6 SC 479, Sanders v. Hartzog | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 48, 7 SC 1, Homestead Building & Loan Association v. Enslow | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 49, 7 SC 25, Levy v. Barrett | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 50, 7 SC 185, McCelvey v. Thomson | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 51, 7 SC 224, Cherry v. McCants | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 52, 7 SC 410, South Carolina R.R. Co. v. Wilmington, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 53, 7 SC 442, Rose v. Izard | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 53, 7 SC 442, Rose v. Izard, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 53, 7 SC 442, Rose v. Izard, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 53, 7 SC 442, Rose v. Izard, pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 53, 7 SC 442, Rose v. Izard, pt.5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 54, 8 SC 129, State v. Spartanburg and Union R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 55, 8 SC 207, Ex Parte Dunn, in re Hand v. Savannah and Charleston R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 56, 8 SC 264, Ex Parte, Barnwell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 57, 9 SC 94, State v. Shaw | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 57, 9 SC 94, State v. Shaw, pt. 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| Vol. 58, 9 SC 465, Singleton v. Lowndes | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 59, 10 SC 226, Barker v. Smith | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 60, 10 SC 259, Wagner v. Pegues | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 61, 11 SC 56, Fraser v. Davie | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 62, 12 SC 465, Tibbetts v. Langley Manufacturing Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 63, 13 SC 5, Reynolds v. Witte | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 63, 13 SC 5, Reynolds v. Witte, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 64, 13 SC 220, Terry v. Calnan | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 64, 13 SC 220, Terry v. Calnan, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 65, 13 SC 228, Gibbes v. Greenville & Columbia R.R. Co. and State, Ex Rel. Atty. General v. Green-ville & Columbia R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 65, 13 SC 228, Gibbes v. Greenville & Columbia R.R. Co. and State, Ex Rel. Atty. General v. Green-ville & Columbia R.R. Co., pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 66, 15 SC 214, Wallace v. Foster | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 67, 17 SC 339, Union Bank v. Wando Mining & Mfg. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 68, 18 SC 473, Nichols v. Briggs | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 69, 19 SC 498, Clark v. Melton | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 70, 19 SC 560, Dunsford v. Brown | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 71, 21 SC 55, Gaffney v. Peeler | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 72, 21 SC 106, York County v. Fewell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 73, 21 SC 245, Adickes v. Allison & Bratton | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 74, 22 SC 47, Whitesides v. Barber | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 75, 22 SC 92, Moore v. Davidson | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 76, 23 SC 328, Dunsford v. Brown | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 77, 23 SC 373, Fraser & Dill v. City Council of Charleston | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 77, 23 SC 373, Fraser & Dill v. City Council of Charleston, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 77, 23 SC 373, Fraser & Dill v. City Council of Charleston, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 77, 23 SC 373, Fraser & Dill v. City Council of Charleston, pt.4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 78, 23 SC 456, White v. Moore | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 79, 23 SC 588, Gardner v. Gardner | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 80, 24 SC 228, 58 AmRep 247, Watson v. Watson | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 81, 24 SC 373, Whitesides v. Barber | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 82, 24 SC 559, McLure v. Melton (Sup.Ct.Nov.Term, 1885): Full case record. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 83, 26 SC 187, 1 SE 594, Hornsby v. South Carolina R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 84, 26 SC 553, 2 SE 495, Green v. Iredell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 85, 30 SC 607, 10 SE 390, Abney v. Cole | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 86, 31 SC 588, 10 SE 545, Green v. Iredell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 87, 33 SC 198, 11 SE 691, Fell v. Charleston, Cincinnati, and Chicago R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 88, 33 SC 512, 12 SE 308, McMaster v. Arthur | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 89, 36 SC 310, 15 SE 132, Waring v. Miller Batting and Manufacturing Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 90, 37 SC 402, 16 SE 155, George T. Sims & Co. v. Miller Brothers | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 91, 38 SC 291, 17 SE 20, Blum v. Richland County | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 92, 38 SC 485, 17 SE 226, Thomas v. Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 93, 39 SC 162, 17 SE 698, 39 AmStRep 709, 20 LRA 520, Johns v. Charlotte, Columbia & Augusta R.R.Co. , pt.1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 93, 39 SC 162, 17 SE 698, 39 AmStRep 709, 20 LRA 520, Johns v. Charlotte, Columbia & Augusta R.R.Co. , pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 94, 39 SC 175, 17 SE 592, Loan and Exchange Bank v. Miller Brothers, pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 95, 39 SC 281, 17 SE 977, Bickley v. Commercial Bank of Columbia, S.C. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 96, 39 SC 296, 17 SE 980, Jumper v. Commercial Bank of Columbia, S.C. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 97, 39 SC 472, 18 SE 58, 39 AmStRep 746, 22 LRA 246, Edwards v. Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 98, 39 SC 507, 18 SE 182, 39 AmStRep 750, Jenkins v. Richmond and Danville R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 99, 40 SC 517, 19 SE 73, Mayo v. Spartanburg, Union, and Columbia R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 100, 41 SC 1, 19 SE 206, Hankinson v. Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 101, 41 SC 285, 19 SE 497, Lipfield v. Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 102, 41 SC 408, 19 SE 858, 44 AmStRep 725, Mobile Insurance Co., et al., v. Columbia and Green-ville R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 103, 41 SC 415, 19 SE 915, Bouknight v. Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 104, 42 SC 114, 20 SE 27, Ruff v. Columbia and Greenville R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 105, 42 SC 211, 20 SE 544, 46 AmStRep 719, 26 LRA 585, State v. Morehead | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 106, 42 SC 306, 20 SE 83, Mobley v. Charlotte, Columbia and Augusta R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 107, 42 SC 488, 20 SE 378, Columbia Water Power Company v. Columbia Land and Investment Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 108, 43 SC 5, 20 SE 804, Hewitt v. Darlington Phosphate Co., et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 109, 43 SC 39, 20 SE 759, Perkins v. Loan and Exchange Bank of South Carolina | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 110, 43 SC 154, 20 SE 1002, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light and Power Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 111, 43 SC 225, 21 SE 10, Mayo v. Spartanburg, Union and Columbia R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 112, 43 SC 370, 21 SE 305, Hobbs, et al. v. Beard | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 113, 43 SC 528, 21 SE 886, Bickley v. Commercial Bank of Columbia, S.C. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 114, 43 SC 547, 22 SE 341, City of Columbia v. Tindal, Secretary of State | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 115, 44 SC 130, 21 SE 610, Buist v. Fitzsimons | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 116, 44 SC 548, 22 SE 724, Scates, et al., v. Henderson | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 117, 46 SC 104, 24 SE 166, Springs, Heath and Co. v. South Bound R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 118, 47 SC 117, 25 SE 48, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Land and Investment Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 118, 47 SC 117, 25 SE 48, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Land and Investment Co., pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 118, 47 SC 117, 25 SE 48, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Land and Investment Co., pt. 3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 118, 47 SC 117, 25 SE 48, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Land and Investment Co., pt. 5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 119, 47 SC 464, 25 SE 744, 34 LRA 215, Leitzsey v. Columbia Water Power Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 120, 47 SC 485, 25 SE 751, 58 AmStRep 905, 34 LRA 222, Nunamaker v. Columbia Water Power | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 121, 48 SC 21, 25 SE 898, State, ex rel. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Sloan and Daly | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 122, 48 SC 80, 26 SE 1, Wenzel v. Palmetto Brewing Co. , pt. 1 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 122, 48 SC 80, 26 SE 1, Wenzel v. Palmetto Brewing Co. , pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 122, 48 SC 80, 26 SE 1, Wenzel v. Palmetto Brewing Co. , pt. 3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 123, 48 SC 430, 26 SE 725, Jumper v. Commercial Bank of Columbia, S.C. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 125, 49 SC 535, 27 SE 570, Congaree Construction Co. v. Columbia Township | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 127, 50 SC 374, 27 SE 803, State ex rel. So. R.R. Co. v. Talley, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 128, 50 SC 558, 27 SE 933, State ex rel. LaMotte v. Smith | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 129, 51 SC 143, 28 SE 301, Feaster v. Richland Cotton Mills | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 130, 51 SC 150, 28 SE 303, Martin v. So. R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 131, 51 SC 180, 28 SE 371, Schroeder v. Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 132, 51 SC 540, 29 SE 245, Wilson v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., Ltd. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 133, 52 SC 36, 29 SE 637, Comer v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 134, 52 SC 236, 29 SE 546, 68 AmStRep 900, Loan & Exchange Bank of South Carolina v. Peterkin | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 135, 52 SC 323, 29 SE 905, 68 AmStRep 913, 40 LRA 679, Mack v. South Bound Railroad Company | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 136, 53 SC 203, 31 SE 212, 69 AmStRep 849, Johnson v. Southern Railway Company | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 137, 53 SC 246, 31 SE 240, Mathis v. So. R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 138, 53 SC 398, 31 SE 283, 69 AmStRep 870, Verner v. Bookman | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 139, 54 SC 579, 32 SE 690, Bank of Columbia, S.C. v. Gibbes | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 140, 55 SC 78, 32 SE 897, Efird v. Iredell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 141, 55 SC 541, 33 SE 584, Oliver v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 142, 56 SC 298, 33 SE 463, reheard in 34 SE 411, Neal v. Suber | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 143, 63 SC 1, 40 SE 963, Huffman v. Huffman, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 144, 63 SC 348, 41 SE 451, South Bound R.R. Co. v. Burton, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 145, 64 SC 254, 42 SE 103, Metz v. Abney, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 146, 65 SC 1, 43 SE 307, Oliver v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 146, 65 SC 1, 43 SE 307, Oliver v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R.R. Co., pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 146, 65 SC 1, 43 SE 307, Oliver v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R.R. Co., pt. 3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 146, 65 SC 1, 43 SE 307, Oliver v. Columbia, Newberry and Laurens R.R. Co., pt. 4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 147, 65 SC 105, 43 SE 395, Blackwell v. British and American Mortgage Co., Ltd., et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 151, 67 SC 136, 45 SE 129, Scott v. Seaboard Air Line Railway | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 151, 67 SC 136, 45 SE 129, Scott v. Seaboard Air Line Railway, pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 156, 67 SC 432, 46 SE 39, Chambers v. Bookman, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 156, 67 SC 432, 46 SE 39, Chambers v. Bookman, et al., pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 157, 67 SC 515, 46 SE 340, South Bound R.R. Co. v. Burton, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 157, 67 SC 515, 46 SE 340, South Bound R.R. Co. v. Burton, et al., pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 157, 67 SC 515, 46 SE 340, South Bound R.R. Co. v. Burton, et al., pt. 3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 157, 67 SC 515, 46 SE 340, South Bound R.R. Co. v. Burton, et al., pt. 4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 167, 70 SC 72, 49 SE 7, Percival v. Bailey, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 171, 71 SC 175, 50 SE 794, Logan, et al. v. Cassidy, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 171, 71 SC 175, 50 SE 794, Logan, et al. v. Cassidy, et al., vol. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 193, 73 SC 550, 53 SE 996, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Nunamaker, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 206, 75 SC 34, 54 SE 833, Columbia Water Power Co. v. Campbell | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 208, 75 SC 68, 55 SE 140, Betchman v. Seaboard Air Line R.R. Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 224, 76 SC 218, 56 SE 983, revised on rehearing, 77 SC 443, 58 SE 417, British & American Mort- gage Co. v. Jones | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 246, 77 SC 443, 58 SE 417, British & American Mortgage Co. v. Jones | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 310, 84 SC 318, 66 SE 418, Ex Parte Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio R.R. v. R. M. McCown, Secretary of St. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 312, 84 SC 487, 66 SE 678, Hardy, et al. v. Reamer, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 314, 84 SC 568, 66 SE 993, Martin v. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light and Power Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 320, 85 SC 278, 67 SE 316, State v. Sowell, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 324, 85 SC 422, 67 SE 1, Best v. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light and Power Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 326, 85 SC 455, 67 SE 562, 21 AmAnnCas 144, McCormick v. Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light and Power Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 334, 87 SC 18, 68 SE 824, Rhodes v. Granby Cotton Mills | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 4 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 5 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 6 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 7 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 339, 87 SC 270, 69 SE 391, aff 240 US 305, 36 S.Ct. 293, 60 L.Ed. 658, Carolina Glass Co. v. State, pt. 8 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 345, 88 SC 438, 70 SE 1035, Chisolm, et al., v. Carolina Agency Co., et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 345, 88 SC 438, 70 SE 1035, Chisolm, et al., v. Carolina Agency Co., et al., pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 1, 90 SC 25, 72 SE 558, Lundy v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 1, 90 SC 25, 72 SE 558, Lundy v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 356, 90 SC 138, 72 SE 564, State v. Garlington & Young | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 356, 90 SC 138, 72 SE 564, State v. Garlington & Young, pt. 2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 356, 90 SC 138, 72 SE 564, State v. Garlington & Young, pt. 3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 361, 90 SC 568, 74 SE 26, State ex rel. Lyon, Atty. General, v. Columbia Water Power Co. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 365, 92 SC 455, 75 SE 881, Am.Ann.Cas. 1914B, 519, State ex rel. Lyon, Atty. General, v. Rhame, Bank Examiner | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 369, 95 SC 403, 79 SE 247, State ex rel. Ray v. Blease, Governor, et al. | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 389, State v. Eichelberger | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 390, State, ex rel Shiver, Hope and Senn v. City of Columbia | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 391, State, ex rel Stolbrand, v. Parker | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 392, State v. Eichelberger | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 393, State, ex rel, v. McQueen, County Treasurer of Kershaw County and State, ex rel, v. Gurney, County Treasurer of Charleston County | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 394, McMaster v. Talley | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 394, McMaster v. Talley, pt.2 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 394, McMaster v. Talley, pt.3 | | Yes | No |
| Vol. 395, Huiet, Adm’r, v. Unger, et al. | | Yes | No |
|
|
|