Logo of LLMC Digital present on all screens.  Clicking here will always return to Homepage
A 501 (c)(3) nonprofit committed to ‘saving the law’
prd server 3Book Bag
Description and Holding Information
1893, U.S./U.K., Arb.-F, Bering Sea Sealing (U.S. argument)
Behring Sea arbitration; Argument of the United States before the Tribunal of Arbitration convened at Paris under the provisions of the treaty
between the United States of America and Great Britain, concluded February 29, 1892: n.a., v+327p, United States, No. 8 (1893), London, pr. for HMSO by
Harrison & Sons, 1893. (A TOC follows the t.p. Lacks index. The underlying controversy being arbitrated in this case arose from a fishery dispute between
the U.S. and the U.K. in the Pribilof Islands off the coast of Alaska. In 1870 the U.S., claiming territorial rights, leased the exclusive right to
kill seals on or near the islands to an Alaskan company under conditions meant to ensure the preservation of the seal population. Great Britain
protested the U.S. exclusion of its citizens from the sealing region, particularly on the grounds that when Russia, the prior sovereign of the islands, had
attempted to assert such claims, the U.S. had joined the U.K. in protest. An arbitration of the dispute was agreed to by treaty, and the matter was
brought before a commission sitting in Paris. The arbitration panel was composed of two members each from the U.S. and U.K., along with three members
appointed by the president of France, the king of Italy, and the king of Norway & Sweden. See also the ten other documents relevant to this case offered
on this site. The award is provided as LLMC title no. 09692.)
Title:   Argument of the United States before the Tribunal of Arbitration convened at Paris under the provisions of the treaty between the United States of America and Great Britain, concluded February 29, 1892 / presented to both Houses of Parliament by command of Her Majesty, March 1893.
OCLC Number:   502361657
Available Volumes
NameFiche CountOnlinePaper Backup
Vol. 1YesNo